I understand the site is called Retrobike , but most of us have interest in cycling in general , not just retrobike .
With the site growing so much it has become more a general cycling website where we like to spend time dicussing all bikes , not just retrobikes .
I dsagree, and not that anyone should really care, but I don't like the idea of splitting the readers bikes. Retrobike should be retro bikes. Who really gives a hoot about looking at new bikes on a retro board? One of the cool concepts implied in a dedicated site, is that the retro way is the best way, and I think that providing for a group for newer stuff dilutes the message. Unless there is some retro tie-in, IE the reintroduction of a once defunct brand like EWR to the market, new bikes have no business on the board. You're the Big-Cheese, John, so just my 2 cents...
MTBR is a total pain in the ass because there are little segmented fiefdoms all over the place for each vague individual microcosm of mountain bikes. Don't let that happen here!
Ridemonkey, Pinkbike, MTBR...blahblahblah. Keep Retrobike different!:D
Drowning in Retro!