Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Thu Dec 08, 2016 5:35 am

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:23 am 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:31 pm
Posts: 2366
Location: The Cave of Shame
Looking at the F2 and F7 which we have brouchures for - its hard to tell as the sizes changed from 17", 19",21" at F2 to 16.5", 18",19" and 20.5" at F7.

What rigid fork a-c length is correct for an F6 - 420mm ala short RC31's ? or something shorter?

Or to ask it another way what length fork was used to generate the 71 degree head angle in the brochures?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:58 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:21 pm
Posts: 824
Location: County Antrim
I'm not sure about the various RC200's but the RC300 was designed around a 80mm RC39 or 440mm RC31 and I'd assume the later 200's were the same. I think the 420mm RC31 was for frames that were not designed for suspension and the 440mm was for frames designed for up to a 100mm suspension fork.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2015 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
bikedeals - the best bike deals in one place
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group