Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:23 am

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:00 pm 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:10 am
Posts: 4473
Location: Bristol
This thread could benefit from photographic evidence. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:17 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:07 pm
Posts: 326
Location: NW London
Rough count so far, 94 and 97 leading the way:

88 I
89
90 I
91 II
92 II
93 II
94 IIIII II
95 II
96 II
97 IIIII II
98
99 I


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:21 pm 
retrobike rider / Gold Trader
retrobike rider / Gold Trader
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:06 pm
Posts: 1388
Location: The Peth
88-90 just for the splatter paint jobs alone....but not for the angles so much..though 89/90 were better than 88/89 on that front....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:22 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:20 am
Posts: 1823
Location: Austria
how about opening a poll ? :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:05 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 11:31 pm
Posts: 934
Location: Costa Blanca
Drewson wrote:
88-90 just for the splatter paint jobs alone....but not for the angles so much..though 89/90 were better than 88/89 on that front....


Yep yep and yep :lol:
I like the way the long head tube makes the bike feel, each to there own though.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:16 pm 
Old School Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:16 pm
Posts: 4337
Another '97....and it's the Explosif you want :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:03 am 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 3113
Location: Woking
Mine: http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... highlight=

Since that was posted I've fitted MT-60 (1989 Deore) cranks with TA chainrings. I must get around to fitting the NOS M730 seat QR one day...

SP


Attachments:
fm_whole_204.jpg
fm_whole_204.jpg [ 168.04 KiB | Viewed 544 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:12 am 
Gold Trader
Gold Trader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:28 pm
Posts: 3361
Location: The Admiral Benbow
hmm i can't judge on ride as i have ridden them all yet, working on it though. but my 94 cindercone was the one i had the most fun on.
the facters that help the look, sus corrected, downtube cables and the spiral decals.
my 96 explosif ticked all the boxes, but felt a bit to fragile to ride it hard


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:05 am 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:29 pm
Posts: 1770
Location: yorkshireland
Easy. 91/92


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:15 pm 
Retro Guru
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:07 pm
Posts: 326
Location: NW London
I'll keep the count of who likes what updated on the first post.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: boswell, Joe_Rides, M-Power, makster, My_Teenage_Self, raidan73 and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2015 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
bikedeals - the best bike deals in one place
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group