Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:32 pm

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:12 am 
retrobike rider
retrobike rider

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 11:22 pm
Posts: 7321
Location: Hove
I have a test here of a 98 Explosif showing a bare frame weight of 4.63lbs and I have another test of it somewhere showing similar. I have other tests of the 98 Caldera and Lava Dome giving weights of 4.8, so it wasn't much lighter and I've always assumed that they used the potential of 853 on strength rather than on light weight.

But it just depends what tubing you specify - the other bikes in that first test (all 853) were a Saracen Kili at 4.74 and an M-Trax at 4.17. I also have here a test of a Rock Lobster (UK) 853 with a weight of 4.2. My own RL 853 weighs 4.2 and has a very lively and racey ride, implying that unlike Kona they used 853 for light weight, rather than strength.

The 97 catalogue quotes the Hot at 3.9 - I'm not saying that was true, as it also quotes 3.9 for the Kilauea and mine weighs 4.2, but it still implies that the 97 frames were a bit lighter than the 98s.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DY85262, Fudd, Minifreak, raidan73, ultrazenith, yakboy and 51 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2015 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
bikedeals - the best bike deals in one place
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group