Perhaps the term 'cool'
is somewhat too subjective?
BITD if Mummy and Daddy were minted and bought you all the latest sh*t because you were an only child and a spoilt brat everyone thought you were another four-letter word that began with a 'c' but definitely wasn't 'cool'
Equally, if you got a job in Daddys company just because he was 'something high up'
(while the rest of us were struggling out of bed at some ungodly hour to do a paper round) so that you could 'buy your own'
sh*t that was better than ours then ditto...WE
didn't care about your DX/XT equipped bike because you couldn't ride any faster than the rest of us in order to escape the kicking you so richly deserved - and at least Daddy could afford the private medical bill to have the seatpost removed from your rectum afterwards
Found this definition of the word 'cool'
online;'when you are cool, you don't need to be told you're cool cos that makes it lame. however, if no one tells you then how would you know? thinking you're cool makes you uncool. not thinking you're cool when you are makes you ignorant. when you don't care about what others think of you and you're okay with who other people are, you're cool. there is a fine line between COOL and GAY and TRYHARD WANNABE. when you're not hyper/annoying, and people like you, you're cool. rambling on like this is not cool.'
Entry-level groupsets may have been heavy and a touch f'ugly but they were a quantum leap above what came before - everything above was just limited by your parents' income and their willingness to indulge their 'little soldier...' You may infer from this that I did indeed have a paper round, and I would have happily killed any one of my 'spoilt-brat' friends if there was even the slightest chance his grieving parents would have adopted me afterwards!
I often think the coolwall things, here, should be done just like on Top Gear - effectively an autocracy - Clarkson decides, then sticks 'em up - sometimes a tedious debate is tolerated, but rarely does it change anything.
I think it shouldn't be a vote to decide - I reckon the guv should just decide for himself, slap it up on the coolwall - and by all means, we can be entertained and have a faux vote and debate - and if the debate has any sway, the guv may decide to be influenced.
I don't think votes on the subjects work - people just vote for what they think is good, or what they like - and that's got feck all to do with whether something is "cool". And it doesn't work that way on Top Gear, which is, after all, what this thing is apeing, here - even the cars owned by the presenters are automatically uncool, most - if not all supercars are - even cars like the M5.
I can't honestly look at how the votes have unfolded, and look at the coolwall, here, and think the results make sense - they don't. We should have a gruff, intractable leader who decides, and we should just grumble a little about it - just enough for comic, fawning effect - then the universe would make sense again.