brocklanders023 Retrobike Rider Gold Trader Feedback View Feb 19, 2017 #3 Re: Yeah, defo 'sub' 580mm. :facepalm:
FluffyChicken Archivist Retrobike Rider Feedback View Feb 19, 2017 #4 Re: 583mm aka 23" 175mm control room and 3deg bend. At least in 1993
ishaw Gold Trader GT Fan Feedback View Feb 19, 2017 #5 Just measured the uncut set 8 have and they are 545mm. I think the +130 were longer. The weight saving was the lopping off a few CMS.
Just measured the uncut set 8 have and they are 545mm. I think the +130 were longer. The weight saving was the lopping off a few CMS.
FluffyChicken Archivist Retrobike Rider Feedback View Feb 20, 2017 #6 Re: My measurements where straight out of the 1993 catalogue and for the sub130. It's in the archive Maybe they beefed them up and cut them down in later years and brought the 130+ out. (Same way Ritchey cut the WCS down from the prolite).
Re: My measurements where straight out of the 1993 catalogue and for the sub130. It's in the archive Maybe they beefed them up and cut them down in later years and brought the 130+ out. (Same way Ritchey cut the WCS down from the prolite).
brocklanders023 Retrobike Rider Gold Trader Feedback View Feb 20, 2017 #7 ishaw":150h9wjc said: Just measured the uncut set 8 have and they are 545mm. I think the +130 were longer. The weight saving was the lopping off a few CMS. Click to expand... That's certainly what I thought. The + were around 580mm, or at least the ones I had were. Remember at the time being told on here the subs were shorter.
ishaw":150h9wjc said: Just measured the uncut set 8 have and they are 545mm. I think the +130 were longer. The weight saving was the lopping off a few CMS. Click to expand... That's certainly what I thought. The + were around 580mm, or at least the ones I had were. Remember at the time being told on here the subs were shorter.